Forums for the Business Analyst

 
  Modern Analyst Forums  Business and Sy...  Business Proces...  BPM Theory/Concept
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post 1/20/2009 11:15 AM
User is offline Nigelus
23 posts
www.altkon.com
9th Level Poster


Re: BPM Theory/Concept 

Hi again,

My suggestion to you is only "an" approach which we would take which is really rapid to develop and which is really agile. It is to do with your second pararaph on your previous post.

We would only have one single process which would consist of the actions or steps to complete the requirement. Instead of making the process top heavy, we would use an automated process framework as a tool for the actual process, then using our business rules and decisioning tool, which acts as a service to the process we would embed the business logic, or policies, or rules for decisioning.

As the process runs as an automated workflow, it would access the business rules engine as a service and thus provide the business context to the steps in the process, or apply the rules to the data at a specific step of the process to enforce the policies or to perform the decisions as required by the application.

Sorry if it is not clear - feel free to send me a PM to [email protected]

Regards

Nigel

 
New Post 1/21/2009 5:30 AM
User is offline Craig Brown
560 posts
www.betterprojects.net
4th Level Poster




Re: BPM Theory/Concept 

 K Robert wrote
...


 A top-down approach is outside the timeframe of the rewrite.  Having said that, can we proceed with an "open" model that will allow for mitigation of misalignment?

When you say Six Sigma, is that the process improvement that is de facto to BPM?

Six Sigma has a framework/overarching process called DMAIC (look it up.)  Essentially this framework helps you identify where the most important prblem areas are with a process.  You can then go off and address them.

It sounds like you already know that, but you could run a light version of DMAIC across your system to see if you are focusing on the right areas as a quality check.

As for a ground up approach - you'd be best off using some sort of agile approach where you deliver incremental useable features that enable the business to gve you feedback on whether you are going the right way.  A tool to help you on that front is a product roadmap.

I hope this is useful and not too abstract for your situation.

 
New Post 1/27/2009 9:50 AM
User is offline K Robert
9 posts
10th Level Poster


Re: BPM Theory/Concept 

If using DMAIC and have identified the problem area(s), can it then be modeled and then proceed w/ a bottom-up appraoch?

 
New Post 1/28/2009 3:03 AM
User is offline Craig Brown
560 posts
www.betterprojects.net
4th Level Poster




Re: BPM Theory/Concept 
Modified By Craig Brown  on 1/28/2009 5:05:18 AM)

You can certainly usea  bottom up (ie start with the details) aproach to the as-is analysis.  You do need to reconcile what is happenning with the strategic goals, so at some stage you need to know what the top level of the organisation is expecting.

It kind of depends on the context of your project. 

I tend to preach the need to stay focused on the higher level goals and processes.  Details are important to acknowledge, but getting the big picture, for me, is crucially important and often neglected.

I also tend to measure my contribution in terms of both success and importance to the organsiation.  So making what I consider to be significant improvements is part of the deal.  This would be a variable based upon where you're at with your career and personal goals.

Anyone of the regulars got a comment on this view?

 
New Post 1/28/2009 3:19 AM
User is offline Craig Brown
560 posts
www.betterprojects.net
4th Level Poster




Re: BPM Theory/Concept 

 craigwbrown wrote

...You do need to reconcile what is happenning with the strategic goals, so at some stage you need to know what the top level of the organisation is expecting.

Let me explain this point a little.Say your analysis has identified that there is 7% rework rates for a call centre.  That is 7% of caler call back within a month with the same issue - becasue ethe first call failed to satisfy them.

You may say GREAT! 7% is a big opportunity.  We could shrink this down to 5% and save $1Million in costs.

Yes, sure.  But has some thinking already been done in this space? Is the 7% rwork rate considerred accceptable? What's the rate like with competitors? And so on.  While it's tre that your million dollar saving would be nice, is there a better opportunity for you just around the corner?  For example by automating a particular process or call type?

That's what I am getting at when I say reconcile your discoveries with top level priorities.

 
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
  Modern Analyst Forums  Business and Sy...  Business Proces...  BPM Theory/Concept

Community Blog - Latest Posts

A business analysis checklist helps you stay organized while you work through projects. It includes questions that will help you identify problems in your current processes, and suggest improvements for future projects. Understand the Problem Before you start writing code, you need to understand what problem you're solving. This means u...
I’ve heard “The End is Near!” for Business Analysts for almost 20 years.  Waterfall project management, with its need for formal requirements, is dead…a dinosaur…so 1990’s.  To be honest, that’s mostly true.  With the publishing of the Agile Manifesto in 2001 there was no need for a 2-inch-...
Business analysis is used to identify and articulate the need for change in how organizations work, and to facilitate that change. As business analysts, we identify and define the solutions that will maximize the value delivered by an organization to its stakeholders. We look for opportunities for new business models and new ways to work together. ...

 






 

Copyright 2006-2022 by Modern Analyst Media LLC