Forums for the Business Analyst

  Modern Analyst Forums  Business and Sy...  Requirements  IDEF0 vs. Use Case
Previous Previous
Next Next
New Post 8/17/2010 7:14 AM
User is offline joetraff
2 posts
No Ranking

Re: IDEF0 vs. Use Case 

 bas wrote


It's really good way to mix IDEF0 (or BPMN) and UML. It's difficult to describe BP by using UML but you can (should) use IDEF0 (or BPMN) to do it. Pls keep in mind BP does not have any relationship with SW in general. After that you should drill down and work with SW requirements. At this level you can (should) use UML to model requirements and architecture (use case, activity, class and other diagrams). Many tools support BPMN and UML in one and it's modern trend to mix BPMN and UML in SW development.


It's good indeed.

Previous Previous
Next Next
  Modern Analyst Forums  Business and Sy...  Requirements  IDEF0 vs. Use Case

Community Blog - Latest Posts

There are big differences between data exploration versus data presentation. And you need to be aware of these differences as you're creating data stories and data presentations. Let’s start by defining our terms: Data exploration means the deep-dive analysis of data in search of new insights. Data presentation means...
Is Agile a reason to avoid documentation? I bet this question shows up again and again while working with product requirements. On one side, we have got long specifications, complicated diagrams, mystical technical design, too many prototypes and pretty obvious for engineers user guides (do we really need so much?). On the other side, can we actual...
The cloud-native application development has helped enterprises all around the globe reduce time-to-market, enhance performance, and develop agility and flexibility. Several enterprises are achieving these results by migrating their systems or traditional monolithic applications to the cloud. But to gain from the real benefits of cloud technology, ...



Copyright 2006-2022 by Modern Analyst Media LLC