Forums for the Business Analyst

 
  Modern Analyst Forums  Business and Sy...  Requirements  IDEF0 vs. Use Case
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post 8/17/2010 6:14 AM
User is offline joetraff
2 posts
No Ranking


Re: IDEF0 vs. Use Case 

 bas wrote

Guys,

It's really good way to mix IDEF0 (or BPMN) and UML. It's difficult to describe BP by using UML but you can (should) use IDEF0 (or BPMN) to do it. Pls keep in mind BP does not have any relationship with SW in general. After that you should drill down and work with SW requirements. At this level you can (should) use UML to model requirements and architecture (use case, activity, class and other diagrams). Many tools support BPMN and UML in one and it's modern trend to mix BPMN and UML in SW development.

Yap....

It's good indeed.

 
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
  Modern Analyst Forums  Business and Sy...  Requirements  IDEF0 vs. Use Case

Community Blog - Latest Posts

As Business Analysts in Agile teams, we often hear about Definition of Ready (DOR) and Definition of Done (DOD). But beyond the buzzwords, these two concepts are powerful tools to drive clarity, consistency, and quality in our work. Definition of Ready ensures a user story is truly ready for development. It answers: Is this story clear, feasible...
In today's fast-paced digital world, successful projects aren't just built on great code—they're built on clarity. And that clarity often comes from one key player: the Business Analyst. At the heart of every great product or system is a need—a business goal, a customer pain point, or a regulatory requirement. But busines...
I have always loved cooking. I learned from my Grandma June and her kitchen was her sanctuary, a small, warm sunlit space filled with jars of spices, stacks of cookbooks, and the comforting smell of something always on the stove or baking in the oven. Grandma June was as great a cook as she was a teacher to me. She never followed a recipe “to...

 






 

Copyright 2006-2025 by Modern Analyst Media LLC