Forums for the Business Analyst

 
  Modern Analyst Forums  Business and Sy...  Requirements  Transitional Requirements - showing process statuses between legacy and future system
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post 2/23/2016 8:23 PM
User is offline transitioned
13 posts
10th Level Poster


Transitional Requirements - showing process statuses between legacy and future system 

Hi All

We re creating a licensing system.  There are 2 main functional groups: licensing and compliance.  In phase 1 we're delivering for Compliance - i.e. they will be the only group using the system.

The high level value chain is:

Application --> Licence --> Licence Conditions --> Inspection --> Enforcement Action

Licensing and Compliance pass information back and forth about licensees.

The question is should we just replicate the old licence statuses in the new system. 

One principle I've used is that Compliance only deal with licenses that are in effect.  So any status where the licence is still an application shouldn't be shown in the new system - because the licence doesn't exist yet.

Another is that some records have statuses that don't exist in the legacy system anymore, therefore those statuses should be mapped NOT replicated.

My issue is more deciding to map or just replicate the statuses that still are valid in the old system and do relate to final licences that have been granted.

But for other statuses should I just replicate the status in the new system?  E.g. in source system we've got a status of 'withdrawn'  currently we're mapping that to 'inactive'.  And there's other statuses that are mapping to inactive - so we're consolidating a list of source statuses to a smaller list of target statuses.

 

 

 
New Post 3/10/2016 9:15 AM
User is offline Chris Adams
308 posts
5th Level Poster






Re: Transitional Requirements - showing process statuses between legacy and future system 

Without understanding a lot more detail about your project and systems it's hard to give a definite answer.

However, I can give you this advice.  If certain statuses make no sense for a user of a particular system, why would you show them at all?  Therefore, it sounds like you would either show a subset of statuses that DO apply, or maybe there is a reason to map certain statuses to another status.


Chris Adams
Core Member – ModernAnalyst.com
LinkedIn Profile
 
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
  Modern Analyst Forums  Business and Sy...  Requirements  Transitional Requirements - showing process statuses between legacy and future system

Community Blog - Latest Posts

Arash
Arash
Let me start by saying that a business rule is far more granular than a business decision, and that the two should never be confused. Today, it is an unfortunate fact that some vendors would have potential clients believe that there is synergy between business rules and business decisions. Perhaps this is because in an effort to differentiate one b...
0 Responses
LN Mishra, CBAP
LN Mishra, CBAP
Traceability is one of the lesser understood aspects of business analysis. It is indeed quite hard to maintain good traceability unless automated. This is why BABoK® warns us being theoretical about traceability. In this article, I would like to explain traceability concepts with help of an example. BABoK® definition of traceability: ...
4 Responses
Hitendra 01
Hitendra 01
Most IT jobs have a clear, specific job description and career path. However, the business analyst career path tends to vary, as do the descriptions from job to job. The business analyst career path is best. Because, “There are career tracks that zigzag back and forth between IT and business. Someone might start as a business analyst, and the...
0 Responses




Featured Digital Library Resources 
Copyright 2006-2015 by Modern Analyst Media LLC